More info
Description / Abstract:
This recommended practice is intended to be applied at the
planning or design stage of a system where power supply and
equipment choices are still ßexible and incompatibilities can be
resolved. The cost of trying to Þx an incompatible system after
installation is hundreds to thousands of times more than addressing
it in the planning stage. Consequently, this document does not
discuss troubleshooting or correcting existing power quality
problems.
Since voltage sags present the greatest Þnancial loss due to
compatibility, this Þrst edition of the recommended practice
develops a compatibility methodology speciÞcally for voltage sags.
However, compatibility encompasses many other issues such as
harmonics, surges, radiated interference, etc. As better
information is available on the environment/equipment response and
experience is gained with this approach, compatibility
methodologies will be developed for other issues. To aid the
evaluation of the non-sag compatibility issues, a guideline list is
included in 4.3.
This recommended practice does not discuss technical options to
improve compatibility. The alternatives are so numerous and
evolving so quickly that such a listing would detract from the
basic purpose of the document, which is to plan for
compatibility.
Clause 4 is the heart of the document and contains the
worksheets used for evaluating compatibility. Completed worksheets
provide an estimate of the number of disruptions, the Þnancial
loss, and Þnancial analysis of alternatives associated with the
compatibility of a system. The annexes provide the background and
techniques necessary to apply the worksheets. They are Þnancial
analyses, power system performance, equipment performance, and
constructing the compatibility charts. An example analysis is
provided in Annex E.