More info
Description / Abstract:
A critical issue in industrial coordinate metrology is the measurement
of a work piece to assure
compliance with its dimensional requirements. When using a
computerized Coordinate Measurement
System (CMS), the usual practice is to correlate computer calculated
outputs with the dimensional
requirements of the work piece. This correlation is performed by
various computer routines that
process dimensional coordinate data sets consisting of measurement
samples of the object being
evaluated.
The purpose of this document is to provide guidelines for evaluating
the quality of solutions
generated by CMS software and to define minimal documentation
requirements for software providers.
This Standard is concerned with testing the behavior of algorithm
implementation, not the testing
of algorithms themselves. It is not the intent of this document to
endorse or rate any
computational method or system.
Software performance evaluation is useful because it:
(a) allows objective validation of software;
(b) reduces the possibility of error in software application;
(c) defines a method of comparing CMS software.
This document covers the following areas: input data, feature
construction, software documentation,
performance characterization, and test methodologies.
The assumptions inherent in this document are as follows.
(a) Measurement uncertainty in coordinate samples is not addressed.
For information on measurement
uncertainty, refer to Appendix A and ASME B89.3.2, Dimensional
Measurement Methods (when released).
(b) Methods to input predetermined samples to the computational system
are available.
(c) Personnel have adequate experience and training to implement the
evaluation and understand the
implications of the results.
This document is one component required for the evaluation of CMSs.
Other relevant documents can be
found in Appendix G.